
TrueDiligence.
Due Diligence is all about
validating stated facts,
eliminating assumptions
& identifying potential risks.
Straight Facts.
No Assumptions.
Risks Identified.
Due Diligence is all about validating stated facts, eliminating assumptions and identifying potential risks. Whether you are engaging in a business transaction, an acquisition, a compliance exercise or a fraud investigation: it is of paramount importance to get the record straight. EDSON is equipped to be part of a multidisciplinary team or to spearhead a legal or regulatory due diligence. We have experience in not just legal investigations but also in (business) ethics enquiries coverings topics such as conflicts of interest. Our teams have the right attitude to ask probing questions without aggressiveness.

How We Are Different.
TrueDiligence is more than Due Diligence. There are a couple of reasons why EDSON is confident enough to coin the TrueDiligence concept.
First, we won’t waste your time. EDSON knows and understands what is material to your business and will go to the heart of the matter. Quickly.
Second, we will go way beyond the data room. Our forte lies in our understanding of how businesses and organizations are run. We will ask the right questions, interview the right individuals. Because the corporate memory of any organization extends well beyond what is written down.
Third, our services offering extends beyond pure legal analysis based on the target’s representations and disclosures. Our experience in discrete and highly regulated industries has taught us to also consider commercial, policy and legislative risks that your target does not need to disclose and maybe does not even know about.

Cases.
Data Leaks.
One-on-one sensitive and non-confrontational interviews with senior management to identify data leaks.
Misconduct.
One-on-one sensitive and non-confrontational interviews and fact finding missions to establish and document professional misconduct on behalf of management team members.
Risk.
In one Due Diligence we did not just analyze the target’s books and data room, but also upcoming policy and funding changes at one of the target’s Key Accounts. This led to the conclusion that various material contracts were at risk.
